New Hampshire Community Rights Network (NHCRN)
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Gallery
    • In Memory
    • Partners
    • Contact
  • News & Updates
  • Projects
    • Informational Audio & Video Snippets
    • Community Rights Workshop
    • We The People 2.0
    • Democracy School
    • Local Resolution
    • State Constitutional Change >
      • CANDIDATE SURVEY RESULTS: Do You Support Local Choice?
      • Sign the Petition
      • Amendment FAQ
  • NH Movement
    • Let the People Decide
    • Community Rights FAQ
    • Right of Local Self-Government & Rights of Nature
    • Rights of Nature Movement
  • Products
  • Donate

News & Updates

Local Governance Advocates Try Again To Amend State Constitution

2/7/2018

0 Comments

 
​nhpr.org/post/local-governance-advocates-try-again-amend-state-constitution#stream/0

Advocates for more local control in New Hampshire are trying again to amend the state constitution, this time to let municipalities pass laws protecting people's health and the environment.
A dozen New Hampshire towns already have ordinances geared toward ensuring locals’ health, safety and welfare, sparked by big energy developments or water quality concerns.
But Granite State municipalities technically can’t enact any laws the state doesn’t allow them to. So supporters say those ordinances wouldn't hold up in court – which is why they need a constitutional amendment.
They tried to pass the so-called Community Rights Amendment two years ago, but failed amid concerns it would give municipalities too much power and undermine state government.
Like most states, New Hampshire follows what’s called Dillon’s Rule, where municipalities derive all their governing abilities from the state Legislature.
A minority of states has varying degrees of the opposite – home rule, where towns and cities can govern freely as long as they follow state and federal law.
Lobbyists for the Community Rights Amendment told the House local governance committee Tuesday the proposal only creates a narrow degree of home rule in New Hampshire. They were joined by dozens of residents and families who support the bill.
Rep. Wayne Burton, a Democrat and co-sponsor, says the amendment would give citizens recourse for when they don't feel the state has their best interests at heart – such as when it permits an unwelcome local land use.
"When the character of the town is severely threatened, the people in local level ought to have an ability to pass a law or regulation under this,” Burton says. “That's what this is for."
The amendment is scheduled for several work sessions before it can go to the House floor. (Read the full text of the bill here.)
CORRECTION: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that about 10 states follow Dillon's Rule. In fact, about 40 do.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Archives

    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Gallery
    • In Memory
    • Partners
    • Contact
  • News & Updates
  • Projects
    • Informational Audio & Video Snippets
    • Community Rights Workshop
    • We The People 2.0
    • Democracy School
    • Local Resolution
    • State Constitutional Change >
      • CANDIDATE SURVEY RESULTS: Do You Support Local Choice?
      • Sign the Petition
      • Amendment FAQ
  • NH Movement
    • Let the People Decide
    • Community Rights FAQ
    • Right of Local Self-Government & Rights of Nature
    • Rights of Nature Movement
  • Products
  • Donate